When Loretta J. Ross received a letter from a convicted rapist in prison, asking for help to learn how to change his behavior, her first reaction was one of anger. Ross was a sexual assault survivor who, at that time, led one of the nation’s first rape crisis centers. But the lifelong activist, writer, and intellectual decided to react differently. She entered into a dialogue with the man, and that conversation inspired her 2025 book, Calling In: How to Start Making Change With Those You’d Rather Cancel.
“My first thought reflects my instincts, and my second thought reflects my values.”
While her first instinct was justified anger, she instead decided to build a connection, hoping to have a positive influence.
Loretta J. Ross is known for her decades of advocacy for people’s bodily autonomy and safety. She’s worked toward these goals by campaigning for reproductive justice and against racism and sexual violence. A necessary part of this work has always been building connections and coalitions among diverse groups that, through dialogue, recognize they share similar goals. So, engaging in this sort of conversation and helping to educate people rather than writing them off is integral to her efforts.
“How we do the work is as important as the work we do, because who we bring along is inseparable from how far we’ll go.”
Calling In: How to Start Making Change With Those You’d Rather Cancel explains how a call-in differs from a call-out and from the popular idea of “canceling” someone who has done or said something offensive. Rather than seeking to punish the person or ensure they are never heard from again, a call-in focuses on inviting them into conversations where they are held accountable and urged to change their behavior in a respectful way.
“And, the first person you have to call in is yourself,” she reminds us. We have the most power to influence ourselves, and we all can hold unhealthy stereotypes and attitudes. “Next, think about whom you have the power to influence. And, when you’re trying to help someone change and re-think their beliefs, avoid being arrogant and saying these four words: ‘I told you so.’”
She applies this framework to the decision about whether to vote for political candidates who may be problematic in certain ways, yet better than the alternatives. “You can vote for someone one day, then protest them the next,” Ross says. “And they’re more likely to listen to their supporters than their opponents.”